Re: Indentation of constants in LISP

[Stuart D. Herring]

> This is not a problem at all, because in this case this old situation is
> also a problem:
>
> (prog2
>     x
>     y
>   z)

How is this a problem?  `prog2' is supposed to indent its first two
arguments specially:

Symbol prog2's plist is
 (lisp-indent-function 2)

>>     (foo :a b :c d
>>               :e f)
>
> This is OK.

Er, what?  Just because two constant-value pairs fit on one line, I don't
follow that we should align everything that follows to the latter.

Davis

-- 
This product is sold by volume, not by mass.  If it appears too dense or
too sparse, it is because mass-energy conversion has occurred during
shipping.