Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time

[David Kastrup]

"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:

> On 2/26/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I don't have an opinion about the setting of the variable, but FWIW
> I'm in Andreas' boat: I have it at default value, and I've never
> noticed any ill effect.
>
>> This is particularly noticeable if the noise level of your system
>> depends on the CPU load (like increased fan usage).
>>
>> Would you be likely to notice this on your system?
>
> Not at work's machine, but definitely on my home's laptop. And I
> didn't notice it (not that it didn't happen, but if it *did* happen it
> wasn't much of an issue).
>
> Perhaps a better metric would be: do you always have lots of
> buffers?

Yes.

> I don't. Most of the time I have perhaps two or three (non-special)
> buffers open. I tend to quickly close any buffer I'm not working on.

Ok, but working with many buffers is not something particularly
forbidden.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum