[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:52:52 -0500 |
Yes, I know of at least 2 causes:
- it's based on polling and may take a long time before the next poll
- the stealth-fontification causes swapping, and so even if the poll comes
immediately, pages need to be swapped back in before the user's command
can complete.
I see.
The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving to
another part of the file. Is fontification now sufficiently fast
that such delays are not much of an annoyance any more?
- Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, martin rudalics, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27