[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time |
|
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:14:32 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:52:52 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> The motive for stealth fontification was to avoid delays when moving to
> another part of the file. Is fontification now sufficiently fast
> that such delays are not much of an annoyance any more?
No, we are definitely not there yet, IMO.
- Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, martin rudalics, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/25
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Stefan Monnier, 2007/02/26
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
- Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/27
Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time, David Kastrup, 2007/02/26