[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --with-gtk as default?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: --with-gtk as default? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:32:18 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 07:29:28 +0100
>
> I have no idea whether this should be considered a general
> showstopper.
I don't think it should be a showstopper.
> If it is not a showstopper, then Cygwin/Gtk+ should likely lead to a
> strong warning upon configuration, and not be the default for Cygwin.
Yes.
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, (continued)
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/27
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jan Djärv, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jason Rumney, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?,
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: --with-gtk as default?, Richard Stallman, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Jan Djärv, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Nick Roberts, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Kim F. Storm, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, David Kastrup, 2007/02/28
- Re: --with-gtk as default?, Romain Francoise, 2007/02/28