[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:30:11 +0100 |
On 3/1/07, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
[ BTW, please always specify whether this is in "console mode" or not,
because the way keys are translated can be different in each case. ]
Sorry. No console; Windows or X (with GTK, BTW :).
Hmm... so w32 does decoding using keyboard-coding-system (aka
encoded-kb)?
I suppose so.
What does keyboard-coding-system say?
cp1252 on Windows, nil on Kubuntu.
Juanma
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/01
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Jason Rumney, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/02
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, David Kastrup, 2007/03/02