[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Mar 2007 18:34:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Again: I don't see that this guaranteed one signal per child, and you
> did not explain how it could.
>
> One signal per child? I seem to recall hearing of a similar project.
> Can the system deliver this signal for only $100?
Quite cheaper, but then only dying children are signaled.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, (continued)
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/14
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/16
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/16
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/13
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler,
David Kastrup <=
Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/03/25
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/25
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/03/25
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/28
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/28
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/28
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/28
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/28
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/28
- Re: busyloop in sigchld_handler, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29