Re: [DIFFS] Re: Connection to emacs CVS broken ?

[Kim F. Storm]

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:

> address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
>
>> Both NIIMI Satoshi and Guanpeng Xu alias Herbert Euler have a fully
>> rsync repository from 2007-03-13.
>>
>> So what if we get both of these, and compare them.
>
> Wouldn't it be easier to just check this in by hand?  We don't have to
> do a mass commit, since Richard objects, but checking the patches in
> individually won't be such a chore.  From looking at the diffs you
> generated, there are only 16 separate major sets of changes to the
> code and manuals (plus a few more minor changes to auxilliary files).
> It would take at most an hour for someone to check these in with the
> appropriate CVS logs.
>
> I volunteer do this if we decide it's a good idea.


> lisp/ChangeLog
> 2007-03-13  Chong Yidong comint.el
> 2007-03-12  Kim F. Storm ido.el
> 2007-03-12  Lawrence Mitchell (tiny change) tempo.el
> 2007-03-12  Carsten Dominik textmodes/org.el
> 2007-03-12  Mark A. Hershberger xml.el eshell/esh-mode.el
> 2007-03-12  Glenn Morris calc/calc-forms.el woman.el startup.el
>
> man/ChangeLog
> 2007-03-12  Glenn Morris calc.texi calendar.texi
> 2007-03-11  Andreas Seltenreich gnus.texi
>
> src/ChangeLog
> 2007-03-12  Andreas Schwab lisp.h process.c
> 2007-03-12  Kim F. Storm process.c keyboard.c

That list is not complete (ref the DIFFS I posted).
At least RMS updated dired.c.

Also, it only covers the trunk.

By installing the most recent rsync tar-ball, we would get
the branches up-to-date as well.

It probably wouldn't take more than 1 hour to compare two
very similar rsync tarballs either.  

So if you could get the two rsync tar-balls, compare and validate
them, and send the "best one" to the Savannah people, it would be time
well spent.

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk