[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Change in process.c
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Change in process.c |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:13:42 -0400 |
What was the reason for moving the first sleep before the first wait3
call? It looks like that will force a one-second delay even
in cases where it would succeed straightaway.
Using usleep would reduce that problem to an acceptable level,
but I am not sure all systems have usleep. So it is risky
to make that change.
What's the issue here?
- Change in process.c,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/26
- Re: Change in process.c, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/28