Re: Change in process.c

[Nick Roberts]

 > Does this version work?

I can't comment on th patch, but

 >        /* For some reason, this sleep() prevents Emacs from sending
 >                loadavg to 5-8(!) for ~10 seconds.
 >                See http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/67722 or
 >                http://www.google.com/search?q=busyloop+in+sigchld_handler */

Links that might disappear, and searches whose results will change, as comments
doesn't seem a good idea.  Can't the reason for the change be summarised in
situ?

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob