[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Change in process.c
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: Change in process.c |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:13:08 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) |
Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
> there must be a sleep BEFORE the first wait.
If that is the case then there is something very broken with your kernel.
After you receive a SIGCHLD it is guarateed that what3 returns immediately
with the status of the changing child.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Change in process.c, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/26
- Re: Change in process.c, Andreas Schwab, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/27
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Nick Roberts, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Change in process.c, Sam Steingold, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Jan Djärv, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Jan Djärv, 2007/03/29
- Re: Change in process.c, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/29
- Re: Change in process.c, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/28
- Re: Change in process.c, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/28
Re: Change in process.c, Randal L. Schwartz, 2007/03/29