Re: Change in process.c

[Sam Steingold]

Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Sam Steingold <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > there must be a sleep BEFORE the first wait.
>
> If that is the case then there is something very broken with your kernel.
> After you receive a SIGCHLD it is guarateed that what3 returns immediately
> with the status of the changing child.

this is the latest fc6 kernel - I am not the only one experiencing this.