[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Sun, 01 Apr 2007 00:44:35 +0300 |
> From: Richard Stallman <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 16:42:31 -0400
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> After all it's been there in one form or another since Emacs-20.
>
> That doesn't change anything.
Yes, it does: it tells us that the way things work now, they do the
job quite well, and that the problem which sparked this thread is a
marginal one which users are unlikely to bump into.
IOW, it should not hold the release.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/27