Re: Incompatibility of CC mode

[Alan Mackenzie]

On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:17:48PM +0900, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > Is there any good reason for this incompatibility?
> > If not, let's get rid of it.

> > ------- Start of forwarded message -------
> > X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 
> >     autolearn=failed version=3.1.0
> > DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta;
> >     
> > h=domainkey-signature:received:received:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:content-type:to:from:subject:date:x-mailer;
> >     
> > b=dTIuFhXeJa1XzScGibBwsvdZozFDIredsI5PPbrUpWmgu46kECkDaB39BkotrBhmcTA1bfRnZsfRJRW43M0hcxmZsOK961kXDmqGSofe63dYoQ60HNZ9Ps43xDen9/w/blSp7/yvJSIP9APBajtKPsf9e9WypGhd4pqBpiNBRD8=
> > Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3)
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
> > To: address@hidden
> > From: Paul Curry <address@hidden>
> > Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:46:32 -0500
> > Subject: c-subword-mode - inconsistent behavior

> > The functions c-capitalize-subword, c-downcase-subword,
> > c-upcase-subword claim to behave like their normal emacs
> > counterparts, but all three functions move the point when given a
> > negative argument.  Furthermore, c-capitalize-subword doesn't even
> > work with a negative argument on my machine.  I changed the functions
> > to better mimic the behavior of capitalize/downcase/upcase/-word:
> > they no longer move point with a  negative argument.

> It seems that Paul's argument is correct.
> I will review Paul's version of code.
 
Masatake: if Paul's code is OK, would you please commit it yourself.
Then I will pick up the change and apply to CC Mode at SourceForge.

Thanks in advance!
 
> Masatake YAMATO

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Ittersbach, Germany).