[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release schedule
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: Release schedule |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:56:23 +0900 |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.97 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> > Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> > From: Chong Yidong <address@hidden>
> > Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:25:20 -0400
> >
> > We know exactly what patches went into the tree, and that they are not
> > risky. So I think the situation is OK.
> In software, you can never know such things for certain, and the more
> changes you make, the less certain you are in the outcome.
> So I think we need another pretest, but if I'm the only one, so be it.
I agree with Eli on this matter.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: Release schedule, (continued)
- Re: Release schedule, Glenn Morris, 2007/04/21
- Re: Release schedule, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/21
- Re: Release schedule, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule, Kim F. Storm, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule, David Kastrup, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/23
- Re: Release schedule, David Kastrup, 2007/04/23
- Re: Release schedule, Romain Francoise, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule, Chong Yidong, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: Release schedule, Richard Stallman, 2007/04/22
- Re: Release schedule, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/04/22