[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:50:26 +0200 |
On 4/24/07, Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> wrote:
I see nothing wrong with that.
I do see it. The issue is not string comparison, but object identity.
It's no different from
(eq 0.0 0.0) => nil
I would be mightily surprised if
(eq (- 2.0 0.0) (- 2.0 0.0)) => nil
(eq (- 2.0 1.0) (- 2.0 1.0)) => nil
(eq (- 2.0 2.0) (- 2.0 2.0)) => t
were true.
Juanma
- Using empty_string as the only "" string, Dmitry Antipov, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, David Kastrup, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, David Kastrup, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Andreas Schwab, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/24
- Re: Using empty_string as the only "" string, Andreas Schwab, 2007/04/25