Re: Emacs 22 branch created.

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

> >   * At the moment, it is slightly worse than current Rmail when it comes
> >     to non-ascii support.  One of the major points of moving to the mbox
> >     format is to be compatible with external tools, and that rules out
> >     storing mailboxes in emacs-mule form, which old Rmail does.  I'm
> >     still not sure what the best approach here would be here.  UTF-8?
> >     Raw text?

> The mailbox should not be decoded, most likely.
> The decoding should only happen when displaying a message.

I agree.  As Gnus, the decoded message should be shown in
the different buffer than RMAIL buffer.

---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden