Re: guided tour suggestions

[Daniel Brockman]

David Koppelman <address@hidden> writes:

>>     M-x shell      Switch to shell buffer
>>     C-u M-x shell  Make new shell buffer
>
> But M-x shell can create a shell buffer, and is certainly the
> easier way to do so if you're not picky about names and only need one.

Good point.

> How about:
>
> M-x shell      Create or just switch to shell buffer named *shell*
> C-u M-x shell  Create shell buffer with specified name

Yeah, that's better.

Maybe even this:

   M-x shell      Create or switch to shell buffer named *shell*
   C-u M-x shell  Create or switch to shell buffer named as specified

(I think it's both clearer and more precise.)

-- 
Daniel Brockman <address@hidden>