[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
|
From: |
Thomas Hühn |
|
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
|
Date: |
Wed, 09 May 2007 21:59:34 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
"Robert J. Chassell" <address@hidden> writes:
> Remember, for many people, but not for many moderns, CVS provides the
> `released version' of GNU Emacs. It is the prime version used by
Really? Under all circumstances?
It has worked over the last months and years quite well, but do you
really want to recommend people to use CVS Emacs when heavy development
is under way? Say, when those unicode-2 branch gets merged?
Thomas
Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/09
Re: CVS is the `released version', Chong Yidong, 2007/05/09
Re: CVS is the `released version', Ken Manheimer, 2007/05/10