[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging multitty
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Merging multitty |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2007 16:17:50 +0200 |
On 5/11/07, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
Good point. But if other things happen to destabilize the trunk, it
will not exactly help getting a multitty branch into good shape.
Agreed.
I would however think it prudent to _first_ have the multitty branch
put into place and synchronized before we do the unicode-2 merge into
the trunk.
Seems like a good plan, as long as it is done soon.
In short: even if we put multitty into a branch, we should give it the
best kickoff we can manage.
Agreed.
Juanma
- Re: Merging multitty, (continued)
- Re: Merging multitty, rentey <address@hidden>, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Kenichi Handa, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, David Kastrup, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Jason Rumney, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Karoly Lorentey, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/12
- merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/11
- RE: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/14
- Re: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, David Kastrup, 2007/05/14
- RE: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, Drew Adams, 2007/05/14
- Re: merging Unicode branch and availability of Windows binaries, David Kastrup, 2007/05/14
- Re: Merging multitty, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/11
- Re: Merging multitty, Miles Bader, 2007/05/11