[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS is the `released version'
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: CVS is the `released version' |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2007 22:26:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Tom Tromey posted a simple implementation of a package system to
> emacs.sources recently. It works fairly well, so the time is already
> invested.
>
> I wish that were true, but most of the work of installing a package
> system is making everything _use_ it.
Everyone doesnt have to use it, just several providers of interesting packages.
And also, a repository maintainer might choose to enter a package into
the system withouth explicit work from a package author.
> Compared with systems like Eclipse, installing an emacs package
> consists of some fairly boring obviously automatable steps. (like
> hunting for the package,
>
> I don't see how any code installed in Emacs could save you the need
> for that.
It can be easier to find a package through an emacs interface, rather
than google.
> downloading in the right dir, entering the
> correct invocation in .emacs, etc...)
>
> Since just loading the files is not supposed to change Emacs
> functionality, I think the need for this cannot be avoided.
A package system can give a user help to install the necesessary
invocation into .emacs, given the users consent, similar to "Customize".
> So that doesn't leave much good that a package system could do.
I do feel there is things a package system can do for Emacs. I base
this on examples like the "Eclipse" editor, and the "Smart" rpm
package manager.
--
Joakim Verona
- Re: CVS is the `released version', (continued)
Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/09
Re: CVS is the `released version', Chong Yidong, 2007/05/09
Re: CVS is the `released version', Ken Manheimer, 2007/05/10
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/10
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/10
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/11
- Re: CVS is the `released version', joakim, 2007/05/11
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/12
- Re: CVS is the `released version',
joakim <=
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Ryan Yeske, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Ralf Angeli, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', David Kastrup, 2007/05/13
- Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/13
Re: CVS is the `released version', Richard Stallman, 2007/05/14
Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/14
Re: CVS is the `released version', Ryan Yeske, 2007/05/14
Re: CVS is the `released version', Mike Mattie, 2007/05/15
Re: CVS is the `released version', Tom Tromey, 2007/05/13