Re: Multi-tty design (Re: Reordering etc/NEWS)

[Dan Nicolaescu]

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:

  > Dan Nicolaescu wrote:
  > > Yes, intentionally as it is irrelevant here. Before your change people
  > > were able to test the multi-tty functionality, after it they are
  > > not. Nobody claimed the code was bug free, but it did do what was
  > > advertised to do.
  > >
  > > This shows a total lack of respect for all the hard work Karoly's put
  > > in for a few years.
  > >   
  > 
  > Helping to fix bugs does not show a lack of respect.

I agree, that might have been the intention, but that is not what I
see happening here. This change strictly made the behavior
worse. Given that for most people this is the first time they have a
chance to play with multi-tty, this does not reflect well on that
code.