Re: MacOS port functional too

emacs-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MacOS port functional too

From:	Jason Rumney
Subject:	Re: MacOS port functional too
Date:	Sun, 20 May 2007 21:38:01 +0100
User-agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326)

David Kastrup wrote:
> Are there other platforms we would need to get a basic hold on before
> merging?

Did we drop vms support for Emacs 22, or did someone come forward to
support it?

That is the only other I can think of.

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, (continued)
- Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status, rentey <address@hidden>, 2007/05/17
- MacOS port functional too (was Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status), Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/05/19
  - Re: MacOS port functional too, David Kastrup, 2007/05/20
    - Re: MacOS port functional too, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/20
    - Re: MacOS port functional too, Jason Rumney <=
    - vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/05/21
    - Re: vms for emacs, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
    - Re: vms for emacs, jasonr, 2007/05/21
    - Re: vms for emacs, David Kastrup, 2007/05/21
    - Re: vms for emacs, Miles Bader, 2007/05/21
    - Re: vms for emacs, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/22
    - Re: vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too], Chip Coldwell, 2007/05/21
    - Re: vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too], dhruva, 2007/05/22
    - Re: MacOS port functional too, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/21
  - Re: MacOS port functional too (was Re: [multi-tty] Emacs port status), Karoly Lorentey, 2007/05/20

Prev by Date: Re: Icon displayed wrong
Next by Date: Re: Patch in configure gets lost
Previous by thread: Re: MacOS port functional too
Next by thread: vms for emacs [was: MacOS port functional too]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread