Re: CVS is the `released version'

[David Kastrup]

Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:

> An analogy can be drawn to the Debian apt system.  By default, this
> points to the Debian software repositories, but it is trivial to add
> third-party repositories to obtain packages that are not included in
> Debian for whatever reason (software patent encumbered codecs,
> experimental packages, etc.)

But a Debian package can't carry within itself the notion of what
repositories to use for it.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum