Re: a bug in erc manual

[Leo]

Dear Michael,

----- Michael Olson (2007-05-26) wrote:-----

> Leo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> (info "(erc)Modules")
>>
>> ,----
>> | `completion'
>> |      Complete nicknames and commands (old).  This is the old module--you
>> |      might prefer the "completion" module instead.
>> `----
>>
>> Does this sentence make sense?
>
> It makes sense, but perhaps it is terse.  Does the following sound
> better?
>
>   This is the old module.  You might prefer to use the "completion"
>   module instead.

Does the OLD module has the same name as the NEW one?

Should the second "completion" be "pcomplete"?

regards,
-- 
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com>                         (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)