[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions |
Date: |
Sat, 26 May 2007 13:34:21 +0300 |
> From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 08:34:50 +0200
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> Windows has no symlinks. That is no concern for Debian, but it would
> be for a general package system.
Latest versions of Windows do have symlinks. (Which of course does
not change in any way the conclusion that symlinks are not the best
idea for a general package system.)
- package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Trent Buck, 2007/05/21
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Trent Buck, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Trent Buck, 2007/05/26
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, David Kastrup, 2007/05/27
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/27
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, David Kastrup, 2007/05/28
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Richard Stallman, 2007/05/28
- Re: package.el: bytecode portability across emacs versions, Michael Olson, 2007/05/29