[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jun 2007 10:23:29 -0400 |
Some things may be worth adressing, but I think mostly this is the same "If
it
isn't Gnome, it sucks"-attitude that Gnome people seem to have.
I don't think we should adopt an attitude of the form "If it isn't
Gnome, it sucks", but better integration with Gnome is a good thing.
And some Gnome dialogs might be substantially more convenient than the
current Emacs facilities. Thus, supporting the Gnome dialogs might be
an improvement in general, as well as an improvement in coherence.
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Kastrup, 2007/06/05
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/06
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David House, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Tom Tromey, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Jason Rumney, 2007/06/08
- Re: IPP under emacs [was: Re: Post-22.1 development?], Ken Raeburn, 2007/06/08