[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should nXML be included
|
From: |
Leo |
|
Subject: |
Re: Should nXML be included |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:11:15 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 Emacs 23 (20070611) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Fedora 7 (gnu/linux) |
----- Peter Heslin (2007-06-12) wrote:-----
> Some years ago, James Clark posted a message to the nxml mailing list
> to say that he would not have time to maintain it. If it were brought
> into Emacs, that would help to avoid the potential for future bitrot
> -- and for me nxml is one of Emacs' killer apps.
This is one of the reasons behind my proposal.
--
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com> (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)
Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included,
Leo <=
- Re: Should nXML be included, joakim, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, David Kastrup, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Claus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15
- Re: Should nXML be included, Eric Hanchrow, 2007/06/14