[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should nXML be included
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Should nXML be included |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:51 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Copyright headers are not necessarily correct. That's why one needs
> the written assignment on file for contributions. If James has an
> assignment that only covers his (explicit) contributions to Emacs, he
> most certainly can't be held responsible for the accuracy of some
> headers in a file he never contributed to Emacs.
He does have papers on file that cover Emacs as well as nXML-mode (and then
some). But before being able to include it, we need to check the
contributions by others, which is usually the trickier part.
The distribution does not come with any ChangeLog, so we will very much the
help of James to figure out what was contributed by whom.
Stefan
- Re: Multiple major modes, (continued)
Re: Should nXML be included, Stefan Monnier, 2007/06/12
Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, joakim, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, Peter Heslin, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included, David Kastrup, 2007/06/12
- Re: Should nXML be included,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Claus, 2007/06/13
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Leo, 2007/06/14
- Re: Should nXML be included, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15
- Re: Should nXML be included, Eric Hanchrow, 2007/06/14