[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2007 10:05:13 -0700 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> > > >
> > > > > I have decided that we should not merge unicode-2 until a
> > > > > couple of months have gone by and we know what should be
> > > > > done about Emacs 22.2. Until then I want to avoid
> > > > > far-reaching changes in the trunk. Please stop making a
> > > > > fuss about a couple of months.
> > > > >
> > > > > However, it is ok to add new features which are not so
> > > > > far-reaching in their effects on the code. Even the
> > > > > multi-tty branch could be merged in (once we decide what
> > > > > to do about the environment).
> > > >
> > > > This development model would undoubtedly achieve the goal of being
> > > > able to make a high quality 22.2 release.
> > >
> > > Undoubtedly? Richard is talking about the trunk, you are
> > > talking about 22.2 which is to be done off EMACS_22_BASE. So I
> > > don't see the two areas actually related, _unless_ one plans to
> > > _scrap_ EMACS_22_BASE and basically copy trunk over it. Which
> > > nobody has proposed, and which I'd consider an even worse idea
> > > than quite a few others I have blown my top over.
> >
> > Your attitude is completely puzzling to me. I made a concrete,
> > constructive proposal to RMS to try to move things in the direction
> > that you seem to want too. Instead of waiting for his reply (as I
> > politely asked)
>
> Since Richard _has_ already declared the trunk open for new
> development, there is no point in asking him to declare the trunk open
> for new development _again_.
No, it is not open for "_any_ new development", that would mean
unicode-2 could get in.
- Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, (continued)
- Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/06/23
- Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/16
- Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model (was: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories), Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/16
- Re: Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model, David Kastrup, 2007/06/16
- Re: Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/06/16
- Re: Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model, David Kastrup, 2007/06/16
- Re: Proposal for a 22.2/trunk development model,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/15
- Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, Jay Belanger, 2007/06/14
- Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, Reiner Steib, 2007/06/17
Re: Syncing Gnus and Emacs repositories, Miles Bader, 2007/06/14