Re: Saving markup formats

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

Nic James Ferrier wrote:
> "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > Only when the specification of the action is available in the schema.
> > Eh, yes. The result should fit into the schema, of course.
>
> It's not just that. A word processor might have non-schema defined
> constraints on a document.

How is that? Do you mean that a document following the schema might not 
be valid as a word processor document?

That is clearly a messy state, isn't it? What about standardization 
committées view of this?

> > But nothing prevents you from doing more complex things. Insert first 
> > result, check completion again etc.
>
> Sure. Maybe that is more powerful than I'm giving it credit for.
>
> But it's too difficult because it's not a DOM.
>
> If it weren't too difficult people (me?) would have already done a lot
> of this stuff.

Could you give me a more concrete example of what you want to do? (Or 
did you give that before?)