Re: elib -> emacs

[Stefan Monnier]

> This directory includes stack-f.el and string.el from
> Elib 1.0.

Why use stack-f.el?  This part of elib has always seemed rather pointless:
cons cells provide perfectly good stacks already.

As for string.el, which part do you use?  It seems this is equivalent
functionality in Emacs-22 for most if not all of it already.


        Stefan


PS: The only interesting part of elib seemed to me to be cookie.el (mostly
included in Emacs as ewoc.el) and avltree.el, although I haven't seen many
uses of avltree.el around.