[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC: marking traversal and pure symbols
|
From: |
David Kastrup |
|
Subject: |
Re: GC: marking traversal and pure symbols |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jul 2007 09:20:37 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.51 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> We can't make Qnil pure, because its plist can be written.
> (It can also be defined as a function, though that would be an
> ugly thing to do.)
Would it not make sense to restrict the purity notion to the value
cell of a symbol?
What would be the bad consequences of that?
--
David Kastrup