Re: slow make-frame + face initialization / importing x resources

[David Reitter]

On 14 Jul 2007, at 02:55, Stefan Monnier wrote:

> The current code checks every possible X resource setting for every  
> face.
> Why not list the resources instead and interpret them?
> [ At least in my case it would probbaly be much faster since I  
> shouldn't
> have any settings in there]

Sounds like a good idea.  Almost all the time is spent on importing  
those X resources. I commented this out and it seems to work just  
fine for me (no X).
On Mac and Windows window systems, is there a reason why X resources  
should be supported in the first place?

Sharing the faces between frames would be good to. Can faces be  
deleted? No? This is probably why more and more faces accumulate over  
time (when you use something like color-theme, e.g.). What is the  
memory footprint of a single frame then?