[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 16:53:57 -0400 |
What's wrong with my original suggestion?
(i) offer an option to adopt the Emacs 22 behavior for the *scratch*
buffer, i.e. with buffer-offer-save and auto-save disabled, and (ii)
delete the auto-save file if the user answers "no" when asked if
*scratch* should be saved.
I understand the first point but not the second.
Regarding the first point, I am not strongly against such an option,
but that is a side issue. The main issue is to make the default
behavior convenient. Once we do that, the option may not be needed.
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, (continued)
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Johan Bockgård, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Tassilo Horn, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Andreas Schwab, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Jan Djärv, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Tassilo Horn, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Jan Djärv, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Chong Yidong, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/07/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/07/18
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/07/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Mathias Dahl, 2007/07/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/07/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Peter Lee, 2007/07/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/20
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/07/20
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Mathias Dahl, 2007/07/21