[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-dired
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: vc-dired |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jul 2007 10:09:52 -0700 |
Masatake YAMATO <address@hidden> writes:
> > Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > > >> I was interested in merge DVC to GNU Emacs. However, these days, I
am
> > > >> busy and I get interests to extend vc-dired, so I've just asked DVC
> > > >> developers to assign another people for working on the merging
task.
> > >
> > > > Given that you are interested in vc-dired, can you please look into
> > > > these issues:
> > >
> > > > - pass --ignore= to ls so that it does not recurse into things like
> > > > .svn directories
> > >
> > > At least the vc.el part of VC should simply not use `ls' or any such
thing
> > > and shouldn't recurse into directories. It should simply ask the
backend to
> > > do it (the backend can then use "cvs -n update" or "svn status" ...).
> > > That'll be blindingly faster.
> >
> > I would go even farther, IMVHO the "dired" part of the interface for
> > vc-dired is not that useful: the 4 top-level menu entries are not very
> > useful in the VC context, there's no top level menu for VC operations
> > and the files not under VC are not shown by default (it would be good
> > to see them so they can be vc-registered if desired).
> > It seems to me that a cvs-status like UI would be preferable to
> > vc-dired.
>
> Here is the first very small patch.
> Do you think menu item "Version Control" is too long?
> "VC" is better?
I would think the former. Why don't you just pick one, we can fix it
later if needed.
> Reorganizing the the 4 top-level is not done yet. I think we have to
> think about integrating version control own command and the menu entries.
>
> svn rm and "Operate"=>"Rename To" menu item.
>
> In a directory which is version-control'ed by svn, vc-dired user may
> expect "svn rm" is run when s/he invoke "Operate"=>"Rename To" menu
> item.
Right. This is one of the reasons why in a previous message I said
that having this mode derived from dired might not be the best idea:
not all dired operations are desirable for version controlled files...
- Re: source repository, (continued)
- Re: source repository, Giorgos Keramidas, 2007/07/17
- Re: source repository, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Masatake YAMATO, 2007/07/04
- vc-dired (was: Re: source repository), Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/07/21
- Re: vc-dired, Masatake YAMATO, 2007/07/21
- Re: vc-dired, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/21
- Re: vc-dired, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/07/23
- Re: vc-dired, Masatake YAMATO, 2007/07/28
- Re: vc-dired, David Kastrup, 2007/07/28
- Re: vc-dired, Masatake YAMATO, 2007/07/28
- Re: vc-dired,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: source repository, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/03
- Re: source repository, David Kastrup, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Karl Fogel, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Jim Blandy, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Karl Fogel, 2007/07/04
- Re: source repository, Yavor Doganov, 2007/07/05
Re: source repository, Richard Stallman, 2007/07/03
Re: source repository, Alan Mackenzie, 2007/07/04