[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance |
Date: |
Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:09:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Davis Herring" <address@hidden> writes:
>> But wearing the others out is not going to address the underlying
>> technical _facts_ of their objections. It is not a matter of opinion
>> that a string does not carry "file", "buffer", "whatever" markers
>> associated with it.
>
> Why do you think we have text properties? We can even propertize
> different parts of the string differently. So we can have
> "namename" with (file t) on the first four characters and (buffer t)
> on the others to name both the file and the buffer into which it
> goes. Stefan (who wants ".") can mark that as (directory t
> absolute nil) which takes care of the where-emacs-is-run-or-not
> problem, and if the string is exactly "eval", then its property list
> is evalled and we can do whatever else is needed.
It is good to see a solution that is not confusing to beginners.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, (continued)
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/01
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/01
- RE: Scratch buffer annoyance, Drew Adams, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Davis Herring, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Miles Bader, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Davis Herring, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Miles Bader, 2007/08/01
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/02
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/03
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/03
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/04
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/04
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/05
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/05