Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp

[Miles Bader]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> Actually, the date should be the date it was committed, so it should
> be sorted.  Not sure about what should happen in case of merges, tho.

I think because of merges, things are always basically going to be a bit
screwed up.  There's no perfect solution.

I'd suggest the best thing would be to relax and not worry about
slightly misordered timestamps on entries.  It's not a big deal.

-Miles
-- 
The key to happiness
 is having dreams.      [from a fortune cookie]