Re: VC acting strangely

[David Kastrup]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

>     As a user command, I'd say it needs renaming back, or at least an alias
>     defined for it.
>
> I think the arguments are strong for bringing back the old name.
> Can you please add vc-revert-buffer as an alias for vc-revert, then ack?
>
> A separate question is whether the callers should be changed to call
> vc-revert-buffer instead of vc-revert.  I have no opinion on that

What is more relevant here is that vc-revert-buffer used to call
vc-cvs-revert-buffer and their ilk.  So quite a number of other
functions travel on that naming convention.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum