Re: VC acting strangely

[Jason Rumney]

Richard Stallman wrote:
>     As a user command, I'd say it needs renaming back, or at least an alias
>     defined for it.
>
> I think the arguments are strong for bringing back the old name.
> Can you please add vc-revert-buffer as an alias for vc-revert, then ack?
>
> A separate question is whether the callers should be changed to call
> vc-revert-buffer instead of vc-revert.  I have no opinion on that
>   

I added it as an obsolete alias. Another part of the same change removed
the norevert argument from vc-rollback, without actually removing all
uses within the function. I'm not sure whether the intention was to
remove it just from the backend interface since it is not needed there
or to remove it completely, but I added it back for now.