Re: Scratch buffer annoyance

[David Kastrup]

Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:

>>> With a new naming scheme David proposed this name could be
>>> `setup-initial-buffer'.
>>
>> Don't put schemes into my mouth.  I seem to remember that my
>> proposition boiled down to `startup-*', where the details about * were
>> still fuzzy, so feel free to start expanding form there.
>
> Sorry, I meant `startup-', not `setup-'.  I am already too entangled in
> this naming mess.  So let's name this new option with all proposed words
> `startup-initial-buffer-visit-contents-display-setup'.

I thing that should be the customization group name.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum