[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Scratch buffer annoyance |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2007 01:00:40 -0400 |
Many user options provide a choice of different value types, but none have a
`-choice' suffix. So I see no better names than `startup-buffer' or
`initial-buffer'.
Those names are not good because the value is not a buffer.
`startup-buffer-choice' is better, because at least it doesn't
imply the value is a buffer.
However, I can also suggest `startup-buffer-initialization'.
`startup-buffer-style', recently suggested, is also better than
just `startup-buffer'.
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, (continued)
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/08
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/08
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/09
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/09
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/11
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/12
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Johan Bockgård, 2007/08/12
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, David Kastrup, 2007/08/13
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/13
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/15
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Glenn Morris, 2007/08/15
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/16
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/17
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/18
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/19
- Re: Scratch buffer annoyance, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/19