[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merging etc
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: merging etc |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Aug 2007 00:07:42 -0400 |
But I think even CVS would be able to create changelogs directly from
the commits the way Emacs maintainers wants it, so I dont see what
switching to git would change in this regard. Its more of a cultural
issue. (git would of course bring us many other benefits)
The CVS change logs are insufficient because they do not list the
authors' names. They list who checked in the change.
So that simply is not an option.
- merging etc, Miles Bader, 2007/08/18
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: merging etc, Miles Bader, 2007/08/22
- Re: merging etc, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/22
- Re: merging etc, Juri Linkov, 2007/08/22
- Re: merging etc, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/23
- Re: merging etc, joakim, 2007/08/24
- Re: merging etc, Miles Bader, 2007/08/24
- Re: merging etc, Leo, 2007/08/24
- Re: merging etc, joakim, 2007/08/24
- Re: merging etc,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: merging etc, joakim, 2007/08/25
- Re: merging etc, Glenn Morris, 2007/08/25
- gnus inserts headers in body [was Re: merging etc], Glenn Morris, 2007/08/25
- Re: gnus inserts headers in body, Reiner Steib, 2007/08/26
- Re: gnus inserts headers in body, Glenn Morris, 2007/08/26
- Re: gnus inserts headers in body, David Kastrup, 2007/08/27
- Re: merging etc, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/26
- Re: merging etc, Glenn Morris, 2007/08/25
- Re: merging etc, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/25
- Re: merging etc, Miles Bader, 2007/08/27