[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Released] Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [Released] Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 03:04:32 -0400 |
Of course, while thinking about this it occurs to me that while (4 5 ...)
(produced with a finite `print-length' or `print-level') is actually
readable, it certainly does not read as what was written. Should this
trigger the unreadable-handling as well?
I don't think so, because if you don't want the length and depth
limits, you simply don't enable them.
- RE: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, (continued)
- Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/10
- Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Davis Herring, 2007/09/11
- RE: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Davis Herring, 2007/09/10
- RE: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Drew Adams, 2007/09/10
- RE: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Davis Herring, 2007/09/10
- Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/10
- Re: [Released] Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Davis Herring, 2007/09/11
- Re: [Released] Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/11
- Re: [Released] Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax,
Richard Stallman <=
- RE: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Drew Adams, 2007/09/10
- Re: 23.0.50; savehist save invalid syntax, Leo, 2007/09/05