Re: emacs.git mirror status

[David Kastrup]

Andreas Schwab <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> For git, the sole difference between a merge and an import is that the
>> former has the branch as a parent commit.  All the other history is
>> reconstructed by git on the fly rather than tracked.  So just
>> redeclaring the respective CVS checkins
>
> There are no such checkins.

Huh?  Miles never checked anything into CVS?

> The history is located only in the various arch trees of Miles and
> Karoly.  I'm currently trying to see if I'm able to combine the cvs
> and arch imports in any useful way.

Again: all that needs to be done is to add the (then current) branch
head of the branch to the parent of Miles' merging commits.  git does
not track any history apart from that.

-- 
David Kastrup