[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
|
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
|
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:19:21 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>:
> OK. As said, we can (and maybe should) provide backward
> compatibility aliases.
Possible...but I severely doubt that API has any clients outside the
Emacs libraries, or I'd have heard of it by now.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
- Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11