[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another VC terminology change?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Another VC terminology change? |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:08:53 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Not about "checkout" which sometimes means "update" and sometimes "get".
> Speaking of "update", vc-update needs to be rethought a bit.
> Mercurial, bzr and git (maybe other systems too) don't seem to want to
> do merges based on a file, but on changesets.
> What should we do about that?
Those backends should simply signal an error if requested to update
something less than the whole tree.
Stefan
- Another VC terminology change?, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/11
- Re: Another VC terminology change?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2007/10/12
- Re: Another VC terminology change?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
Re: Another VC terminology change?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11