[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:41:34 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> So what? Regardless of the original intention, what's important is how it
> actually behaves.
But if you use it to a different end, you shouldn't be surprised if the
behavior isn't always ideal (e.g. if TAB doesn't apply
directory-abbrev-alist). This said, I have nothing against TAB calling
abbreviate-file-name.
Stefan
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, (continued)
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/13
- RE: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Drew Adams, 2007/10/13
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/14
- RE: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Drew Adams, 2007/10/14
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/14
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- RE: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Drew Adams, 2007/10/15
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- RE: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Drew Adams, 2007/10/15
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/16
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/14
- Re: should `minibuffer-complete' use `abbreviate-file-name'?, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/13