[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: frame-local variables weirdness
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: frame-local variables weirdness |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Oct 2007 12:29:18 -0400 |
PS: As a matter of fact, I don't even see a need for frame-local variables
at all: they *are* used currently, but only because they exist.
I see that currently they are not used very much. However, I would
not have added the feature merely because it made sense. I would only
have done so if it solved a problem. I would expect there was some
discussion at the time about reasons to add the feature. Can someone find
that discussion and see what the motive was?
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/11
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/12
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/12
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/14
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, David Kastrup, 2007/10/14
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/15
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/15
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/17
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/17
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/18
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/18
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/19
- Re: frame-local variables weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/19