[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: region-active-p
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: region-active-p |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:25:44 -0400 |
> What about to introduce `region-active-p' and/or
> `region-exists-p' for
> (and mark-active transient-mark-mode)
I think this is a good idea. Instead of putting everywhere
a complex condition:
I agree. But we need to decide whether (not (eq (region-beginning)
(region-end))) should be part of it. The name `region-active-p'
implies that it doesn't matter whether the region is empty.
- region-active-p, Andreas Röhler, 2007/10/19
- Re: region-active-p, Juri Linkov, 2007/10/19
- Re: region-active-p,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: region-active-p, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/21
- Re: region-active-p, Miles Bader, 2007/10/21
- Re: region-active-p, Andreas Röhler, 2007/10/21
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: region-active-p, Andreas Röhler, 2007/10/23
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: region-active-p, Andreas Röhler, 2007/10/24
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/24
- Re: region-active-p, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/10/24
- Re: region-active-p, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/25